Re. 135 Last night]

Andre' Kesteloot akestelo@bellatlantic.net
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:29:44 -0500


Kudos to Dexter :-)
Andre' N4ICK

Dexter McIntyre w4dex wrote:

> Laurie,
>
> I would not have seen your signal if you were on or below 135.921.   I
> was running Argo in 60 second dot mode and was only viewing from .921 to
> .924.  I had selected this so I could see both your and Jim's
> frequency.  On the Argo scale 1851 hz is 135.92105 and the 1854 hz mark
> is 135.92405.  The  2 + minuet mark near center at the 1854 line is my
> reference marker on 135.924. It is about .5 hz low of the Argo line and
> is the reason for the .5 hz offset.
>
> http://dmcintyre.home.att.net/135923on30Jan01.jpg
>
> After reviewing all captured shots for the night I suspect your signal
> may be just below the frequency line at 1851 hz on Argo.  This frequency
> line  and the one at approximately 1853.6 are always present at night
> here so please try to avoid this frequency.  Looking right at the bottom
> edge of the shot and on many other shots I can see what may be your
> signal.  I'm sure sorry I missed it if that is so.
>
> Jim, M0BMU, has verified his signal at 135.924 KHz.  His fast CW id can
> even be seen as a blur just before the first 110 second dash.  I lost
> his signal shortly after this shot.  Jim reported his insulators melted
> at 0130 UT.  This shot was made at 0114 UT.
>
> I will be listening anytime your advise of your transmitting but looks
> like QRN is on the menu for tonight.
>
> 73,
> Dexter
>
> LAWRENCE MAYHEAD wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dexter and Larry,
> > Looks like Jim made it across last night,congratulations Dex and Jim.
> > I was on 135,919.9-,922 near as I can get but the 135,923 signal definately
> > Jims. With my low power I need better condx..We may have a CME tonight,
> > but I will be on again from 19:30. 73s Laurie.