Who is the speaker subject for Aug. 8 meeting?
W3HXF@aol.com
W3HXF@aol.com
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 03:48:56 EDT
--part1_15d.122c814e.2a837c68_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Who is the speaker and subject for Aug. 8 meeting?
Suggestion, answer:
18 USC 2510 and 2511 even for hobby curiosity or testing purposes may well
have just become a federal felony with 5 years in jail .
"
> This seems to have changed the status of revealing as part of a
> hobby list any hint of the contents of a radio communications that might
> or might not have been legally intercepted from a potentially minor
> misdemeanor offense or less to a serious felony. Thus if a court finds
> that any communication reported on an Internet list was not legally
> intercepted, felony penalties apply for publishing the information even
> if the interception was for hobby purposes (which of course most scanner
> list intercepts are)."
--part1_15d.122c814e.2a837c68_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Who is the speaker and subject for Aug. 8 meeting?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Suggestion, answer:<BR>
18 USC 2510 and 2511 even for hobby curiosity or testing purposes may well have just become a federal felony with 5 years in jail .<BR>
"<BR>
> This seems to have changed the status of revealing as part of a<BR>
> hobby list any hint of the contents of a radio communications that might<BR>
> or might not have been legally intercepted from a potentially minor<BR>
> misdemeanor offense or less to a serious felony. Thus if a court finds<BR>
> that any communication reported on an Internet list was not legally<BR>
> intercepted, felony penalties apply for publishing the information even<BR>
> if the interception was for hobby purposes (which of course most scanner<BR>
> list intercepts are)."<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_15d.122c814e.2a837c68_boundary--