<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head><body><p>The law suit is new to me -- there hasn't been anything in the press, or on the web, that I've noticed.</p><p>But it doesn't surprise me. This devious approach to getting people to use their latest version, whether</p><p>they want to or not, needed to cost them something. It wouldn't surprise me, now that the news is out,</p><p>for somebody to launch a class action law suit encompassing everybody who has had this happen to</p><p>them.</p><p><br></p><p>The switch from "optional" to "recommended" was the last straw, so far as I was concerned. A lot of</p><p>people have set their machines up for automatic install of "recommended" patches for security's sake.</p><p>Slipping a replacement OS in as a patch is reaching pretty low.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>On June 28, 2016 at 3:29 PM Nan and Sandy Sanders <radiodog77@pobox.com> wrote:</p><blockquote><p>It took this long or are we just hearing about it?</p><p><a href="http://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft/microsoft-draws-flak-for-pushing-windows-10-on-pc-users/">http://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft/microsoft-draws-flak-for-pushing-windows-10-on-pc-users/</a></p><p>_______________________________________________<br>Tacos mailing list<br>Tacos@amrad.org<br><a href="https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos">https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos</a></p></blockquote></body></html>