LABELS

[André Kesteloot]

Agreed it should not be the "Andre&Dave&Randy Newsletter" (although I recall it having
been like that in the past... !)
Just an idea: Sandy and Terry have both bult and used the new AMRAD standard: the DVFO
II. How about Terry and Sandy somehow writing a.s.a.p. a joint artoicle explaining the
gooid sides, etc of the unit they built?
Could George LeM also produce a short article, possibly on some nostalgia subject he is
so good at?
Just an idea.
Andre
*******************************************************

Randy Mays wrote:

> Andre and others,
>
>     I have downloaded Dave's article from the Internet.  There are several pictures
> and I need to somehow get those into Microsoft Publisher, etc.  With one page from
> you, Dave's article, and another page from me - if I get the time to write it this
> weekend, we still don't have enough material for a newsletter.  It is important that
> some of the innocent bystanders get involved in this by writing something.  This
> shouldn't be the Dave and Andre newsletter.
>
>     Thanks.
>
> Randy
>
> André Kesteloot wrote:
>
> > Hi Tracy,
> > Yes, I am going to need, by the end of next week, a new set of labels for the 3rd
> > issue of the year (May-June).
> >
> > Hi Randy,
> > Dave Borden tells me he gave you an article about our meeting at W4RI regarding
> > the 136KHz AMrad application
> > In addition you say you habe one page, and I can easily fill another one.
> >
> > Let's get moving on the May-June issue (which should have gone to the printers
> > about a month ago...)  :-)
> >
> > 73 to all
> > Andre
> > **************************************
> > TRACY WOOD wrote:
> >
> > > I saw your note about the label corrections sent 6/18.
> > > I left some of the roster change-correpsondence at my office so I will not get
> > > a set cranked out until next week.   If push comes to shove I will put them in
> > > the McLean mailbox.
> >
> > OK by me.
> >
> > Andre