LF: Which effect is this?]
Andre Kesteloot
andre.kesteloot@ieee.org
Fri, 05 Oct 2001 08:24:56 -0400
--------------87E9494581F13215548332C1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Walter Blanchard wrote:
> At 20:02 04/10/01 Thursday, Wolf wrote:
>
>> I guess if the car had a ferrite antenna like many of the old
>> tabletop radios, things would be very different.
>
>
> Yes. We found many years ago that ferrite loops worked fine under
> bridges etc with the Loran-C system. They are also much better in
> high electrostatic fields i.e. thunderstorms.The problem is they are
> directional so you have to have two crossed loops with phase
> matching. I have such an antenna on my car now for picking up the
> 300 kHz DGPS transmitters.
>
> Walter G3JKV.
>
>
>
>
--------------87E9494581F13215548332C1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Walter Blanchard wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> At 20:02 04/10/01 Thursday, Wolf wrote:
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial"><font size=-1>I
guess if the car had a ferrite antenna like many of the old tabletop radios,
things would be very different.</font></font></blockquote>
<p><br><font face="arial"><font size=-1>Yes. We found many years ago that
ferrite loops worked fine under bridges etc with the Loran-C system.
They are also much better in high electrostatic fields i.e. thunderstorms.The
problem is they are directional so you have to have two crossed loops with
phase matching. I have such an antenna on my car now
for picking up the 300 kHz DGPS transmitters.</font></font>
<p><font face="arial"><font size=-1>Walter G3JKV.</font></font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br> </blockquote>
<br>
<br> </html>
--------------87E9494581F13215548332C1--