FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless telecomservices should be disrupted intentionally

[Chip Fetrow]

Yes, I assumed it was simplex only, but it appears it took out some  
amateur repeaters.

I assume WUSA was avoided as part of a white list, and that is just  
insane.  If I was going to use those frequencies for triggering a bomb  
(and I assume this is why radio frequencies are targeted) I would  
likely use something like RPU frequencies as they might be "white  
listed."

--chip

On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:00 PM, tacos-request at amrad.org wrote:

> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:14:40 -0500
> From: <wb4jfi at knology.net>
> To: "Chip Fetrow" <tacos at fetrow.org>,	<tacos at amrad.org>
> Subject: Re: FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless
> 	telecomservices	should be disrupted intentionally
>
> That's weird.  Channel 9 never had problems down there using 450MHz  
> two-way
> radios.  We did not have repeaters from before 1977 until after I  
> went to
> corporate in the mid-1990s, just a couple of simplex freqs.
>
> Chip, could they have targeted amateur freqs?  I assume you mean ham  
> freqs
> in your email.
> Terry