CPS to Hz Conversion

[Joseph Bento]

Richard, you certainly wouldn't be the first to base your doctrinal 
thesis on this chart (borrowed from the 'Glowbugs' mail list:

/I based quite a bit of my PhD research on such a chart, and a quick 
check of a salient number used quite often by the scientific community; 
20, shows considerable accuracy, what with the orthogonal intercepts of 
20 HZ and 20 Cps/
//
/mike dormann, chief scientist; WFGRF/
also known as mike w7dra

Joe, N6DGY

On 4/1/2012 10:19 AM, Richard O'Neill wrote:
>  Thanks, Joe. With this new chart I can complete my doctoral thesis 
> and hopefully pass those tough oral exams in useless trivia.
> Next stop, TV game shows! 8-)
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 4/1/2012 10:10 AM, Joseph Bento wrote:
>> Fellow Tacoistas,
>>
>> I don't know where this chart has been all these years, but what a 
>> lifesaver it will be!  As some of you know, I enjoy antique 
>> electronics, and as such, they used "cycles" in the old days.  Since 
>> we use "Hertz" today, I was always pulling out the calculator for 
>> manual conversion:  (log[cps](Hz))2 = 1.  This chart will avoid all 
>> the potential for error.
>>
>> I hope that you will find it handy as well.
>>
>> Follow link:
>>
>> www.kirtland.com/CyclesperSecondtoHzConversionChart.pdf
>>
>> Joe, N6DGY
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tacos mailing list
>> Tacos at amrad.org
>> https://amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tacos mailing list
> Tacos at amrad.org
> https://amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://amrad.org/pipermail/tacos/attachments/20120401/ab5093c4/attachment.html>