Off shore turbines (Was Re: Potential dumpster diving opportunity).
bbruhns at erols.com
bbruhns at erols.com
Fri Feb 8 15:25:50 CST 2013
þhe idea is good, even if the implementation isn't ideal. It would be pretty cool to derive power from big storms and tornados, and sap their energy at the same time. I suspect that the first such thing we'll perfect is something to sap the electrical build-up of lightning. oit will nÓt safe for early experimenters, though.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Kesteloot <andre.kesteloot at verizon.net>
Sender: tacos-bounces+wa3wdr=amrad.org at amrad.org
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:04:42
To: <tacos at amrad.org>
Reply-To: andre.kesteloot at ieee.org
Subject: Off shore turbines (Was Re: Potential dumpster diving opportunity).
On 2/8/2013 12:18 PM, Mike O'Dell wrote:
>
> i was just reading about the next generation off-shore turbines which
> are targeting
> 10 Megawatts per turbine. The blades for those suckers are 100 METERS
> long,
> so the diameter of the blade swept area is 200 meters.
anything that is mechanical suffers wear-and-tear, hence needs maintenance.
Offshore structures (I known, I installed and commissioned a pirate TV
station built on an oil-drilling rig) are fraught with problems.
I am not certain that the advocates of off-shore turbines always include
the long-term maintenance cost in their sales-pitch ...
André
_______________________________________________
Tacos mailing list
Tacos at amrad.org
https://amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
More information about the Tacos
mailing list