NationalJournal.com - Don’t Be Alarmed by the Drone Blimps Hovering Over D.C.

[Alberto di Bene]

On 7/27/2013 4:03 PM, Andre Kesteloot wrote:
> /NationalJournal.com - Don’t Be Alarmed by the Drone Blimps Hovering Over D.C. They’re Here to Stop Cruise Missiles -
>
> http://www.nationaljournal.com/nationalsecurity/don-t-be-alarmed-by-the-drone-blimps-hovering-over-d-c-they-re-here-to-stop-cruise-missiles-20130726//
> /

Copied from that article :

> /According to Raytheon 
> <http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/rtnwcm/groups/gallery/documents/digitalasset/rtn_134404.pdf>//, the units will 
> protect a city at 500-700 percent less than the cost to //
> //operate the reconnaissance planes necessary to maintain the same amount of coverage./

Maybe my math is a bit rusty, but IMHO a saving of 100% means bringing the total cost to zero.
So, what a saving of 500-700% does mean ? Do they actually gain, instead of spending, money doing that ?
Please enlighten me, thanks

73  Alberto  I2PHD


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://amrad.org/pipermail/tacos/attachments/20130728/0107cb26/attachment.html>