Defect reported in Intel chips

Phil philmt59 at aol.com
Mon Jan 8 10:15:36 EST 2018


In Intel’s defence, the article cited below is neither the least biased, nor an entirely un-sensationalized (to coin an Americanism) account. And the articles highlighted at the bottom of the page are even worse. That an industrially-accepted architecture turns out to have an unforeseen vulnerability does not mean that Intel is being two-faced about the need to try to fix the problem.

On the other hand, my mid-eighties BBC Microcomputer suffers from none of these problems, and boots up in two seconds.

Phil M1GWZ


> On 8 Jan 2018, at 03:30, Richard Demaret <ric.demaret at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> .
> Greetings,
> 
> Here is an update on the Intel chip problems.
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/05/spectre_flaws_explained/ <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/05/spectre_flaws_explained/>
> 
> 
> Best Wishes
> Richard KI4KXJ

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.amrad.org/pipermail/tacos/attachments/20180108/35594e35/attachment.html>


More information about the Tacos mailing list