anyone with an entry level FPGA development board (VHDL support) they don't need?

Sat Mar 14 19:05:42 EDT 2020

Samudra - the flowchart you posted is for the NIOS II Embedded Processor
Design Suite not Quartus Prime Lite for FPGA and SoCs.   NIOS II is a
fairly complex 32 bit processor that you probably would never need for an
embedded system.

If you want a complex development framework then Quartus is probably a good
choice - it will take you weeks or months to become proficient.   Once
proficient you can start learning a HDL and FPGA concepts.

ISE Design Suite, the IDE for older low end Xilinx Spartan FPGAs like the
Spartan 6 has been deprecated to help sales of new chips.

Note that Intel/Altera makes money on IP and there's a lot of open source
stuff available for Lattice.  I remember seeing an IDE that worked like
gnuradio-companion and took functional blocks like filters/
modulator/demodulator to compile for Lattice FPGAs.

--Martin

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 3:12 PM <samudra.haque at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, yes, Martin, but I willing to take on a complex development
> framework during the Corona virus downtimes for the benefit it might give
> me, as I get ready to produce another piece of unique technology this year.
>
>
>
> I admit: so far without an EE formal education, but rather a CS background
> with practical hardware projects, I was 0.25 EE degree in 1989, 0.5 EE in
> 1997 when I developed broadband microwave equipment, 0.75 EE by the
> post-grad development from fundamentals to flight hardware. I wasn’t
> exposed to FPGA or DSP as I wasn’t in the EE discipline at all but I can do
> all the math.
>
>
>
> No, I don’t want to spend time in getting to work. I estimate if I had
> been educated in class in using the toolchain like what I saw in the video
> I linked, and the tutorial that I am reading through, it would have saved
> me a whole summer’s worth of heads down work that I completed in 2013 on my
> own to take the lab bench parts (see picture) using MCF5270 to the
> proto-flight board (which had different pin outs and different peripherals
> and different BSP for the RTOS) that used MCF54415 family. To get around
> the requirement the flight software be mature, I had to develop my own
> ‘abstraction’ of the pin names/signal names/register maps so that I could
> (with limited money) test between the lab version (MCF5270) and the flight
> prototype EM-1 (MCF54415) interchangeably with a runtime firmware flag
> based upon what hardware was present.
>
>
>
> Roughly this last year, I was coding BPSK modulators in C++ on my own just
> as a challenge, but I felt constrained by just programming and wanted to
> have real hardware to output a signal. Then I stumbled upon FPGA routines
> for generating carrier waves (ref:
> https://zipcpu.com/dsp/2017/07/11/simplest-sinewave-generator.html and
> http://www.andraka.com/files/crdcsrvy.pdf and it just hit me on the head:
> I was thinking 50 year old design methods:  code first and then separately
> design the mod/demod using  discrete blocks etc. etc. --
>
>
>
> *From:* Martin <dcmk1mr2 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 14, 2020 5:08 PM
> *To:* Samudra Haque <samudra.haque at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Terry N4TLF <n4tlf at wb4jfi.com>; Tacos <tacos at amrad.org>
> *Subject:* Re: anyone with a entry level FPGA development board (VHDL
> support) they don't need?
>
>
>
> You are making extra work for yourself going Intel or Xilinx.  Those
> design tools support a large variety of FPGAs - some of which are very
> large and complex and cost what a house goes for.  You project requires a
> small, simple FPGA.  Do you want to spend your time leaning a proprietary
> tool chain or the FPGA basics?
>
>
>
> https://hackaday.com/2019/07/05/bringing-fpga-development-to-the-masses/
>
>
>
> --Martin
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM <samudra.haque at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wow, I am learning a lot thanks to Taco’s forums. I regret not paying
> attention to FPGA world earlier. I just sat through 30 minutes of a free
> training course on Intel’s website: and a wholesome review of a tutorial
> using the flow chart shown below – and it would I am most sure at this
> point, be easy for me to replicate my manually designed electric rocket
> subsystem (see pics from 2015) control system, into an FPGA version down to
> the 10 uS synthetic reprogrammable timebase I had to design, to validate my
> multi-rocket synchronization routines – I honestly was just paying
> attention to the physics, and not to the EE techniques then.
>
>
>
> Back then I was using Netburner hardware, and wholly customized PCB, with
> IGBT power switches and ~40 amp transient discharges from an inductive
> energy storage system I calculated manually. Well --- an FPGA containing a
> soft-core MCU, some external switches, RTOS application (the same possibly
> that I used in the RTOS of Netburner environment) and some barebones serial
> comms seem to be practical to implement with these methods, …. And I may be
> able to develop new control processes and drive other elements .. without
> much delay ! Perhaps even use the onboard NIOS II DSP section to do
> mod/demod ? BTW, I liked the training material 100 and 200 level FPGA
> courses on the intel website, free with registration. Like:
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/support/training/catalog.html?keywords=nios
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Terry N4TLF <n4tlf at wb4jfi.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 14, 2020 12:54 PM
> *To:* samudra.haque at gmail.com; 'Martin' <dcmk1mr2 at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* 'Tacos' <tacos at amrad.org>
> *Subject:* Re: anyone with a entry level FPGA development board (VHDL
> support) they don't need?
>
>
>
> Here are a couple of books that might be of interest regarding Verilog:
>
>
>
> This book is interesting, and a little bit different.  It doesn’t require
> actual hardware for most of it’s content.  I bought the Kindle version.
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Designing-Video-Game-Hardware-Verilog-ebook/dp/B07LD48CTV/ref=sr_1_5?keywords=verilog+book&qid=1584203304&sr=8-5
>
>
>
> THe title is accurate: a Concise guide to be sure.  Again, not tied to any
> hardware, and somewhat light on details.  Fairly thin.
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Verilog-Example-Concise-Introduction-Design/dp/0983497303/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=verilog+book&qid=1584203528&sr=8-1
>
>
>
> I have the Kindle version of this book.  It uses a few specific boards.
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Programming-FPGAs-Getting-Started-Verilog-ebook/dp/B01M0F1L5G/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=verilog+book&qid=1584203803&sr=8-2
>
>
>
> THis is more expensive, I have the paper version.  It has the most of my
> bookmarks of any book I have.  That says it all.
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Embedded-Design-Using-Programmable-Arrays/dp/1589094867/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Embedded+design+using+Programmable&qid=1584204048&sr=8-1
>
>
>
> There are several other books that I have.  Like many other technical
> references, there is not ONE single book that is best.
>
>
>
> I have used the Papilio and Digilent FPGA boards (among others) to help me
> learn most of what I have now forgotten, regarding FPGAs.  I now have some
> newer boards boards based on Zynq FPGAs, such as the Red Pitaya, a
> MicroZed, and others.  These are MUCH more powerful, but also much more
> complicated.  My brain hurts whenever I delve into them.
>
>
>
> 73, Terry, N4TLF
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* samudra.haque at gmail.com
>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2020 8:42 PM
>
> *To:* 'Martin'
>
> *Cc:* 'Tacos'
>
> *Subject:* RE: anyone with a entry level FPGA development board (VHDL
> support) they don't need?
>
>
>
> Hi Martin, thanks for the tip. I went looking for the board you
> recommended from Lattice (it’s offered at a good price) but if I am not
> mistaken, it doesn’t have any peripherals such as switches  for onboard
> experiments? The photos show it comes with LEDs, but no switches.
>
>
>
> Then I went looking for the icestorm documentation and it seems they ship
> from UK (the blackice boards) so despite those development boards being
> chock full of accessories for experimentation, the shipping delay and cost
> sort of makes it expensive.
>
>
>
> So, randomly I searched and came across (comments requested) *for about
> $43.85 total with shipping*:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/STEP-MAX10-Intel-Altera-FPGA-development-board/143318504573?hash=item215e72d47d%3Ag%3AlcQAAOSwARpdGDCw&LH_BO=1
>
>
>
> and according to the website
> http://www.stepfpga.org/step-max10-development-board/  it is fully
> supported by:
>
>
>
> Altera MAX10 FPGA: 10M02/10M08
>
> On board USB Blaster programming circuit
>
> 2-character 7-segment display
>
> Two RGB LEDs
>
> Four switches
>
> Four push buttons
>
> Eight user LEDs
>
> Power from MicroUSB connector
>
> 40 pins DIP connector with 36 User I/Os
>
>
>
> ·        STEP-MAX10 Hardware Manual 1.0
> <https://github.com/stepfpga/STEP-MAX10/blob/master/docs/STEP-MAX10%20Hardware%20Manual%201.0.pdf>
>
> ·        STEP-MAX10 Software Manual 1.0
> <https://github.com/stepfpga/STEP-MAX10/blob/master/docs/STEP-MAX10%20Software%20Manual%201.0.pdf>
>
> ·        STEP-MAX10 Source Code
> <https://pan.baidu.com/s/1guMNzIYx2Q4sUGhQ1pSUvg>
>
> ·        STEP-MAX10 Schematic diagram
> <https://github.com/stepfpga/STEP-MAX10/blob/master/docs/STEP-MAX10%20Schematic.pdf>
>
> ·        Software&Tools <http://fpgasoftware.intel.com/?edition=pro>
>
> The software suite is … Altera (Microsoft) Quartus Prime Lite, which
> includes ModelSim for soft logic analyzer waveform output … and supports
> Verilog and VHDL. I think that could be ok for mid-level developers, right?
>
>
>
> But since the documentation says “*On board JTAG programming circuit*”,
> is an actual JTAG gadget still necessary for this device, or is that
> functionality already included somehow?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Martin <dcmk1mr2 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2020 7:26 PM
> *To:* Samudra Haque <samudra.haque at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Tacos <tacos at amrad.org>
> *Subject:* Re: anyone with a entry level FPGA development board (VHDL
> support) they don't need?
>
>
>
> You might want to take a look at
> https://www.amazon.com/LATTICE-SEMICONDUCTOR-ICE40HX1K-STICK-EVN-Evaluation-iCE40HX1K/dp/B00R3QU9K0
> for a board and do a google search for Windows iceStorm support.  The are
> more expensive FPGAs from Intel/Altera amd Xilinx but the tool chains are
> awful.
>
>
>
> You also might want to check to see if you really want to invest in VHDL
> or if Verilog might be better for your needs.  It doesn't hurt to know both
> but Verilog is more like C and is less trouble to learn.
>
>
>
> Learning to simulate is a really import skill for FPGA development so you
> can get started with that before you have hardware.
>
>
>
> 73 Martin W6MRR
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:50 PM <samudra.haque at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to do an experiment with an FPGA development board. I’m
> looking for something with pinouts or with a switch + LED; My experience
> with VHDL is very limited. I will be using Windows 10 for my development
> environment.
>
>
>
> If anyone has a board they don’t need, would you be willing to sell it at
> a Tippy’s Taco’s meetup to me? Send me the product manufacturer part number
> and your ask to samudra.haque at gmail.com.
>
>
>
> Also, if I had no FPGA board, is there a emulator environment that I can
> compile the code and get a testbench / diagram of the signals? At least I
> could begin coding / developing the framework right away.
>
>
>
> 73 de Samudra N3RDX
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tacos mailing list
> Tacos at amrad.org
> https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tacos mailing list
> Tacos at amrad.org
> https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.amrad.org/pipermail/tacos/attachments/20200314/c3929fba/attachment-0001.html>