FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless telecomservices should be disrupted intentionally

[wb4jfi at knology.net]

That's weird.  Channel 9 never had problems down there using 450MHz two-way 
radios.  We did not have repeaters from before 1977 until after I went to 
corporate in the mid-1990s, just a couple of simplex freqs.

Chip, could they have targeted amateur freqs?  I assume you mean ham freqs 
in your email.
Terry


-----Original Message----- 
From: Chip Fetrow
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:17 PM
To: tacos at amrad.org
Subject: Re: FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless 
telecomservices should be disrupted intentionally

YEARS ago, I tried using simplex near the White House.  We got
clobbered every time we keyed up.

We could use repeaters.

It turned out that there were (are?) jammers around the White House
that would come up on your frequency when you came up.  They were high
enough power to kill simplex communications, but low enough in power
that I could still key up the repeater.

--chip

On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:08 PM, tacos-request at amrad.org wrote:

> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:08:53 -0500
> From: Andre Kesteloot <andre.kesteloot at verizon.net>
> To: tacos at amrad.org
> Subject: Re: FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless telecom
> services should be disrupted intentionally
>
> If they keep doing that, people will just find a work-around, such s  Ham
> Radio repeaters  :-)
> Long live ham Radio
> 73
> Andr?

_______________________________________________
Tacos mailing list
Tacos at amrad.org
https://amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos