FCC soliciting comment on how and where wireless telecomservices should be disrupted intentionally

[wb5mmb]

I can remember discussion at a T-MARC meeting about this system 
causing a problem to a 440 repeater in Arlington from time to time. I 
wonder if they had a white list of frequencies.
      Sandy
     WB5MMB

At 12:14 AM 3/6/2012, wb4jfi at knology.net wrote:
>That's weird.  Channel 9 never had problems down there using 450MHz 
>two-way radios.  We did not have repeaters from before 1977 until 
>after I went to corporate in the mid-1990s, just a couple of simplex freqs.
>
>Chip, could they have targeted amateur freqs?  I assume you mean ham 
>freqs in your email.
>Terry