Win 10 lawsuit

[RICHARD BARTH]

http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-to-make-saying-no-to-windows-10-update-easier/?ftag=TRE17cfd61&bhid=20329112831297873671731585418656 http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-to-make-saying-no-to-windows-10-update-easier/?ftag=TRE17cfd61&bhid=20329112831297873671731585418656


Yeah, I guess getting your butt sued is "customer feedback".

> On June 28, 2016 at 3:59 PM RICHARD BARTH <w3hwn at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>     The law suit is new to me -- there hasn't been anything in the press, or on the web, that I've noticed.
> 
>     But it doesn't surprise me. This devious approach to getting people to use their latest version, whether
> 
>     they want to or not, needed to cost them something. It wouldn't surprise me, now that the news is out,
> 
>     for somebody to launch a class action law suit encompassing everybody who has had this happen to
> 
>     them.
> 
> 
>     The switch from "optional" to "recommended" was the last straw, so far as I was concerned. A lot of
> 
>     people have set their machines up for automatic install of "recommended" patches for security's sake.
> 
>     Slipping a replacement OS in as a patch is reaching pretty low.
> 
> 
> 
>     On June 28, 2016 at 3:29 PM Nan and Sandy Sanders <radiodog77 at pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>         > > 
> >         It took this long or are we just hearing about it?
> > 
> >         http://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft/microsoft-draws-flak-for-pushing-windows-10-on-pc-users/
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Tacos mailing list
> >         Tacos at amrad.org
> >         https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
> > 
> >     > 


 

> _______________________________________________
>     Tacos mailing list
>     Tacos at amrad.org
>     https://lists.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/tacos
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.amrad.org/pipermail/tacos/attachments/20160628/1ea5412a/attachment.html>